Fast Eddie's vs Iceberg Drive Inn Franchise Comparison

Below is an in-depth analysis and side-by-side comparison of Fast Eddie's vs Iceberg Drive Inn including start-up costs and fees, business experience requirements, training & support and financing options.

Start-Up Costs and Fees

 
Fast Eddie's Franchise
Iceberg Drive Inn Franchise
Investment $245,000 - $295,000$132,500 - $556,000
Franchise Fee $25,000$25,000
Royalty Fee --
Advertising Fee --
Year Founded 19871960
Year Franchised 19872001
Term Of Agreement --
Term Of Agreement --
Renewal Fee --


Business Experience Requirements

 
Fast Eddie's Franchise
Iceberg Drive Inn Franchise
Experience --

Financing Options

 
Fast Eddie's Franchise
Iceberg Drive Inn Franchise
  In-House/3rd PartyIn-House/3rd Party
Franchise Fees -/--/-
Start-up Costs -/--/-
Equipment -/--/-
Inventory -/--/-
Receivables -/--/-
Payroll -/--/-

Training & Support

 
Fast Eddie's Franchise
Iceberg Drive Inn Franchise
Training --
Support --
Marketing --
Operations --

Expansion Plans

 
Fast Eddie's Franchise
Iceberg Drive Inn Franchise
US Expansion --
Canada Expansion --
International Expansion --

Company Overviews

About Fast Eddie's

Fast Eddie's: A unique twin drive thru fast food concept, serving proprietary menu items, BigXtreme Burgers, CrazyFrys, and WildShakes.

Lowest Royalty Structure, full support and a history of Success since 1987.

About Iceberg Drive Inn

The first Iceberg Drive Inn was opened by Lamar Sorensen on April 12, 1960.  A local ice cream machine salesman named Hap Vitale had the idea for a building with a distinctive roof that served great milkshakes, burgers and fries.  He convinced Lamar to open this concept and Iceberg Drive Inn was born.  It was located on the corner of 900 East and 3900 South in Salt Lake City, Utah.  The building was originally designed to be moved after a few years as he was only renting the land at the time.  Many report that it was the first drive thru in the Salt Lake City area.  Lamar insisted that Drive Inn be spelled with two "n’s” as he felt it appeared friendlier to invite people to an "inn” rather than simply a "drive in”.